Originally Posted By: lunde
I meant that when I started that thread in mid-March, I was unaware of the one that was started a couple months before, for the reasons I explained. I simply pointed out a thread that I started, without any claim to originality. Unlike others, I don't claim threads as my own. Once posted, they are part of the community. Apparently, others feel differently.

In additional, a thread with 50+ pages of posts is far from ideal when it comes to garnishing photographic advice.

Oh, and good luck with the screen captures. That's why that functionality exists. I am not quite sure of what you think you're gaining by doing so, though.


Yet you were still prepared to claim you started the thread, immediately after you had been made aware of a previous thread. When by your own standards you should have acknowledged the idea was not original. This is not a very good standard for moderator on our forum
_________________________
Graham