"Life is full of little annoyances, and whiners complaining about them."

So when your argument is demonstrably inconsistent and without merit you resort to name calling?
Excellent debating skills Miles. Well done.

OK. So now your argument is I am a lawyer so I twist words and write "dumb things". Another personal attack? I guess I struck a nerve.

Too bad this could not have been a real discussion. Others might have found it an interesting debate and joined in.

A common marketing scam is, in my opinion, exactly what we are talking about. Throwing in a Randall case with a non-Randall product is done just so that the non-Randall product will come up on a search for a Randall product. It is done, as we all know, to get around the eBay rule against key word spamming which many people who shop on eBay, including me, find annoying.

You don't share my opinion, fine, but your personal insults don't do a thing to lend credibility to you or to your arguments.

"End of the discussion on [your] part." Not so much a discussion on your part as one personal epithet after the other.