In the Historical King Faisal thread, Joe stated:
One final reflection I will leave you with Sam that is troubling, and that is you inexplicably continue to reference baby dot Johnson's when comparing sheaths in the transition discussion. I have stated this numerous times, but here it is again:
IT HAS NEVER BEEN ABOUT BABY DOT SHEATHS. NEEEEEVVVVEEERRRRRRRRR
Therein lies a portion of your problem.
In the end, what I see is yet another ruined thread by non other than yourself.
Respectfully, It does have to do with baby dots, just as it has to do with Heiser. Its called establishing a baseline for comparison. How else could you possibly do it Joe?
Just because Heiser changed to HKL and used another stamp on the early RMK brown buttons, they continued with the same workers. Manufacturing techniques continued.
Just as Johnson used the same manufacturing techniques when he quit using brown buttons and started using baby dots.
If prior Heiser, and later baby dots weren't part of the equation, there would be no way to distinguish, other than opinion.
Why on earth are you attempting to separate baby dots out? We know Heiser/HKL brown button manufacturing style, based on prior Heiser examples. We know Johnson brown button style based on baby dot style.
Each maker had his own style.
Really Joe?
Previous Topic
Index
