Funny stuff Tom.

I am afraid that will not happen.
Joe wanted to get started early and asked a question about Capt Chris' sheath. I answered him, then asked him a question.

The thread was locked down, and nothing from Joe....

Part of what happens when someone tries to marginalize a observation is to ignore it, hoping that it goes away.

I was perfectly happy, letting it all lie, then Mr Dorsky tried to further trivialize the observations with his statement:



The topic had nothing to do with the sheaths in this thread Re: "Historical" ? King Faisal II Randall Knives

Those innocent looking statements are a way to attempt to marginalize.

They probably do haunt Joe, because he can't dispute them head on, so he tapdances around them.

I await good fact backed debate. I don't think it will happen.

You see, Joe was happy years ago with the decision to lump the early RMK sheaths all together because he obviously didn't consider these observations that would have distinguished clearly and concisely.

Tom, I am afraid this thread will die, as my others did. They will say its because its a non issue, or the debate is over....that's the Tapdance I refer to