Here is the exchange in Ron's "edited" version:

Originally Posted By: Boblade
Your subsequent "disclaimer" was pathetic:

Originally Posted By: crutchtip


Of course a hands on examination would be best and the possibility of me changing my mind although somewhat remote could happen.




And you're using the term lame with me?

That's it, Joe. Find yourself another participant.



This is the full paragraph with the portion Ron used highlighted:

Originally Posted By: crutchtip


I will put it out there my friend, because I think it is exactly what I say it is. An early example, maybe one of the first Johnson BB sheaths to be identified as such. Of course a hands on examination would be best and the possibility of me changing my mind although somewhat remote could happen. I guess it is a no brainer to think I could expect the same from you at this point, so while not ideal, the photos will have to do.


Sounds a bit different with the full text.

_________________________
www.rmkcollector.com

BUY-SELL-TRADE