Oh, I see. While I am reasonably sure the 1-8 could be a Johnson, I can't say 100%, especially w/o a hands on examination, you are not willing to offer the same consideration that it only could be a Heiser. You are adamant about it because of the snap location and stamp orientation only as though it is an absolute. Nothing else presented to the contrary is even considered. You can't even bring yourself to acknowledge that maybe you do see why I might think what I think.

You should come clean, this second sheath scares ya. Rather than give your opinion on it, and risk possibly being forced to concede that I made some valid points, you are gonna use a lame excuse to withdraw from participation. Shame.

What started out as a decent discussion deteriorated into a pack of wolves mentality with you and Jack over what, a difference of opinion on a sheath?!! Seriously?

Well it looks as though I can continue to present information w/o our two most vocal detractors electing to bow out for reasons unknown, well not really, I think we all know why.