I should have anticipated a reply like that.

The stitching, Joe the stitching!

No matter. I've been doing some thinking (Yeah I know that's dangerous):

After agreeing on all the evidence a year and a half ago, why would Joe bring up a sheath that is obviously a Heiser and attempt to make a case that's it's an early Johnson?

There's only one scenario that makes sense because like I say you're a smart guy: Gary won't agree to let you authenticate a BB sheath with center keeper position and West facing logo as Heiser or HKL made and you are trying to pave the way to justify your certification that it's a Johnson sheath!

If that's the case, then I'm going to give you a pass and state this for Gary's benefit. If it is not the case, then I'm stating it for yours:

The market puts a premium on Heiser vs. Johnson sheaths. If a customer's authentication states "Johnson sheath" in these cases, then your going to be doing them a dis-service in terms of market value! Market value aside, the most important thing is the accuracy of Randall history!

So.......... the question is: Are you going to be authenticating any BB sheaths with center keeper and West facing logos as HKL sheaths?