#20372 - 06/15/09 12:18 AM
 
Re: 6. Randall "ordering" questions
 
[Re: Condor]
 | 
 
 
 
Knife Enthusiast
 
 
Registered:  07/08/06
 
Posts: 2444
 | 
Thanks for the quick reply. ,  I did find the same mention in a current catolog. Lke you, I haven't seen this option "in the flesh". Practicality and pleasing asthetics are two viable reasons for owning Randalls. Having carried a #1 in Iraq, for reasons different from most collectors, I can assure everyone that my days of carrying knives for use in business are (hopefully) behind me. Since I have never seen a #2 with sawteeth it occured to me that it might be a very pleasing weapon, visually. As I said, I don't intend to ever use one proffesionally again, I'm just a lover and small time collector now. Having said that, with no intention of ever using a #2 for anything more than fondling and drooling over, I bet a No 2 with sawteeth would work wonders between the sixth and seventh ribs, or with a long blade, plunged directly between the left collarbones and "rocked" back and forth to open the heart and lungs with one good poke... Of course, I could be wrong.I do think those serrations will often make there way through tougher mediums, like cartilidge and thick protective skin, like on a human back, or the sinewy musculature of the back of ones' neck. Those sewteeth might be more valuable to the fighting man, than say, a hunter or a bushman, dressing deer and birds and the like. Great thing about Randalls, they make the best knife, for  every application! 
_________________________ 
Wally 
  
 
 
 |  
| 
Top
 | 
 | 
 
 
 | 
 
 
 | 
 
 
#20373 - 06/15/09 12:28 AM
 
Re: 6. Randall "ordering" questions
[Re: Wally]
 | 
 
 
 
Knife Enthusiast
 
 
 
Registered:  12/29/08
 
Posts: 202
 
Loc:  Rocky Mountain High
 | 
"Quick reply" - all of my e-mails go to my BlackBerry, which can be both good and bad.
  Sawteeth on commando knives has been a topic of heated debate ever since Gerber started putting them on the Mark II about a million years ago. I can see where the smaller teeth on the MK-II might be of some value; not sure about the bigger teeth on the Randalls, though. Then again, I'm no expert. 
_________________________ 
Jeff Yencho RKS #5789 Member, Red Sox Nation NRA Instructor NRA Recruiter NRA Benefactor Member
 
 
 |  
| 
Top
 | 
 | 
 
 
 | 
 
 
 | 
 
 
#20374 - 06/15/09 11:31 AM
 
Re:  Randall "ordering" questions
[Re: Doug74]
 | 
 
 
 
Knife Enthusiast
 
 
 
Registered:  09/14/05
 
Posts: 13098
 
Loc:  Central Florida
 | 
I'm Baa-aack!!   Doug...and anyone else who is watchin'. The Model #7 is available with a double hilt...and it only counts as "one" option.   Secondly: A #12-8" with stainless (option #1), nickel silver double hilt (option #2), forward curved (option, but not chargeable, as that shape is standard on a #12-8), aluminum and black spacers (option #3), Black micarta handle (option #4) and a "crow's beak" butt cap, in aluminum (option #5) is doable and the handle will "automatically" be shaped in the #22, "Outdoorsman" style at no additional charge. In order to install finger grips the crow's beak would have to be changed to a standard (or rounded) butt cap...and finger grips are "chargeable", so you  would be over on options. Hope this helps. Best, Capt. Chris 
 
 |  
| 
Top
 | 
 | 
 
 
 | 
 
 
 | 
 
 
#20375 - 06/15/09 11:38 AM
 
Re: 6. Randall "ordering" questions
[Re: Wally]
 | 
 
 
 
Knife Enthusiast
 
 
 
Registered:  09/14/05
 
Posts: 13098
 
Loc:  Central Florida
 | 
Wally:   Sawteeth, especially the way Randall cuts teeth are only available (or were available) in a "dirk/stiletto" styled blade on a Jack Crider special. The sawteeth that Jeff refers to on the Gerber's were really more serrations, and much, much more assymetric, as opposed to sawteeth with a singular direction built into their shaping.    I have seen a Model #2 with teeth and am fairly sure they were shop-installed. The knife was several decades old and unavailable in any reference material. Hope this helps. Best, Capt. Chris     
Attachments
62557-7in.Crider.jpg  (509 downloads)
  Edited by Captain Chris Stanaback (06/15/09 11:38 AM)
 
 |  
| 
Top
 | 
 | 
 
 
 | 
 
 
 | 
 
 
#20377 - 06/15/09 06:48 PM
 
Re:  Randall "ordering" questions
[Re: Captain Chris Stanaback]
 | 
 
 
 
Knife Enthusiast
 
 
Registered:  12/15/08
 
Posts: 616
 
Loc:  NE
 | 
Nice to have you back Captain....you are the man! 
_________________________ 
***DB***
  
 
 
 |  
| 
Top
 | 
 | 
 
 
 | 
 
 
 | 
 
 
#20379 - 06/19/09 09:10 PM
 
Re:  Randall "ordering" questions
[Re: Captain Chris Stanaback]
 | 
 
 
 
Knife Enthusiast
 
 
Registered:  12/15/08
 
Posts: 616
 
Loc:  NE
 | 
How many chargeable options?
  Model #7-4 1/2
  1)  Nickel Silver Double Hilt 2)  Smooth Flanged Butt Cap (Duralumin) 3)  Wrist Thong 4)  Leather Commando Handle (Does this count as one?) 5)  Stainless Blade
  Do I still have one more chargeable option left?
  As always...thanks for feeding my disease! 
_________________________ 
***DB***
  
 
 
 |  
| 
Top
 | 
 | 
 
 
 | 
 
 
 | 
 
 
#20380 - 08/18/09 03:02 PM
 
Re:  Randall "ordering" questions
[Re: Captain Chris Stanaback]
 | 
 
 
 
Knife Enthusiast
 
 
 
Registered:  09/14/05
 
Posts: 540
 
Loc:  Greenbrier, AR
 | 
Capt. Chris,
  I have a slot coming up with Sullivan's in about a year or so and I am making up my mind as to how to option a model 5.  You answered some questions for me a while back, and I believe I ended up with 6 options, 1 of which was a sharpened top blade.  
  I have decided to eliminate the sharpened top blade option to keep it at 5.  But my question is. . .would it be bad form to, after I receive the knife and at a later date, send it back to the shop to have the sharpened top blade option added?  I realize that would be adding a 6th option and taking up shop time.  I certainly do not want to do something that I shouldn't.
  What is your opinion on this?
  Thanks in advance. 
_________________________ 
Keith Hicks RKS Member #4613
 
 
 |  
| 
Top
 | 
 | 
 
 
 | 
 
 
 | 
 
 
 
 
	
 |  
 
 |